MY SUBMISSION TO CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL ON THEIR ARTS STRATEGY POLICY
Public notification that a strategy policy was even being
developed has been appalling. That aside, if the CCC truly does want
Christchurch to be "an innovative and exciting place to live, where our
creativity helps us reach our potential", it must first address the
following things:
(1) Even before the quakes of 2010 and 2011, and massively
exacerbated by them following, is the issue of affordable space, both for
creative working environments (exhibitions, studios, rehearsal, performance
etc), but also living space because creative practitioners for the most part
don’t have a lot of disposable income.
(2) Relevant to point (1), the cities that attract creative
talent and sustain vibrant national and world-class cultural lives (Berlin, for
example) combine a balance of affordable living, lifestyle and working with
places to exhibit/perform, patronage and audiences.
(3) The current post-quake arrangement of arts advocacy
being essentially a duopoly between Arts Voice and Christchurch Arts Audience
Development Trust is unworkable and unsustainable as it merely serves the
interests of already established organisations and institutions without
allowing any room for individuals or new organisations to approach and develop.
(4) The reconstruction of the inner city has meant a total
gentrification that ignores the needs of fringe and boutique cultural life –
there is, for example, no longer a High Street full of second hand books,
clothes and furniture, no close concentration of art galleries, no cheap city accommodation.
I can see potential in the east end of St Asaph St, but the CCC is
going to need to offer inducements like better street parking.
(5) Young artists/practitioners have been largely ignored in
policy development, which is utterly ridiculous.
(6) The suburbs, especially in the east of the city, have
been completely marginalised and largely ignored. That is incredibly
short-sighted, not least because this is an area of affordability where
creative practitioners live, and yet resources are limited.
I will end on a salient comment by art critic Anthony Byrt
in the September/October issue of Metro
in relation to similar issues in Auckland, “If you really want to make this a
great place to live, give it back to the people who bring it to life”.
Comments
Post a Comment